Politico Arena topic: Will women overlook Romney's 'binders' comment?
Women are one
of the key demographic groups in the 2012 election. They vote at a higher
rate than men—they composed 53% of the electorate in 2008 and 54% in 2004. In
2008, Senator Barack Obama was able to win the White House largely because of a
13 point margin among women. Senator John Kerry lost narrowly in 2004 largely
because the gender gap closed to only 3 points. Until President Obama
underperformed in the first presidential debate, he enjoyed a very large
advantage among women ranging from 10-20 points in public opinion in many
surveys. That gap narrowed in the days following the debacle in Denver.
Governor Mitt
Romney’s comment in the second presidential debate that in an effort to find
qualified women for his gubernatorial administration he collected “binders full
of women” has been panned and it’s veracity questioned.
Besides becoming a hash tag sensation on Twitter and fodder for late-night
comics, political observers have brought new focus to Governor Romney’s
policies on gender. And that focus has revealed positions that are sure to
enlarge the gender gap. Mitt Romney’s position on the Fair Pay Act of 2009
(Lilly Ledbetter), the first piece of legislation signed into law by President
Obama, has been: I’ll get back to you.
His shifting positions on contraception and abortion from when he was a
candidate for the U.S. Senate, to when he was Massachusetts governor, to when
he was a Republican primary candidate, to when he was a general election
candidate, can be described as nothing but Etch-a-Sketch.
But perhaps Governor
Romney’s biggest problem is his own party. The modern Republican Party is
openly hostile to women’s rights on a number of issues. From opposition to legislation mandating equal pay for equal work for women,
to support for legislation in numerous states mandating transvaginal ultrasounds for women seeking abortions,
to a Republican Party platform that says no abortions, no exceptions,
many believe the GOP is on the wrong—and extreme—side of women’s issues.
Governor Romney’s biggest problem with America’s women is being the nominee of
a party viewed as wildly out of touch with the mainstream values of a majority
of those women. Proudly carrying the banner of Republican Party orthodoxy on
gender issues may be fine in a primary battle, but is very problematic in a
general election and may well cost Romney the White House come election day.
Permalink to Politico Arena comment.
Posts
2 comments:
Hope you don't mind a little constructive albiet tough criticism here.
I understand tensions are high due to the election but if you're going to comment on every stupid thing a candidate says, this website needs to be updated every hour of every day, because that's how many stupid comments are out there. And realistically, what Romney said is only stupid if you look at it hard enough.
If you want to shed light on comments like these, you need to srat with Vice President Biden and his "in chains" comment, which was much more dispicable than this. Racism is a great national shame and to have him exploit it by saying Republicans want to put black people in chains, just to score a few cool points, is pathetic.
I cannot comment on everything & because of time & usually I reprint my comment's on Politico's Arena website here. That said, the difference is that Biden's comment was just stupid; Romney's comment is important because it illustrates the challenge he has in capturing the women's vote in 2012--a problem made worse by his party.
Post a Comment