From Rose Mary's Stretch to Larry's Wide Stance: Oh the Lame Excuses They Make

A great story in Politico about politicians and the lame stories they tell to cover their rear ends. Former Democratic Senator and presidential candidate John Edwards is just the latest in a string of elected officials caught with their hands in the cookie jar or their pants down that spin incredulous tales in an effort to save their vaunted position, their reputation, or both. Scandal is certainly not a new phenomenon, as evidenced by William Blount's expulsion from the U.S. Senate in 1797; it's just that the information is easier to obtain these days and makes for repeated time on TV and stories on the Internet with the 24 hour news cycle.

What always amazes me is the incapacity of politicos to understand that the American public is quite forgiving, particularly if you confess your sins in a heartfelt, convincing manner. Of course, that depends on the sin, some of which are beyond public absolution.

So...if the kid is yours, Mr. Edwards, you might as well fess up now because it will come out sooner rather than later. Unlike in 1797, there are such things as paternity tests that will prove it one way or the other.

I leave you with this little gem from then-Senator John Edwards about President Bill Clinton at the height of the Monica Lewinsky debacle: "I think this President has shown a remarkable disrespect for his office, for the moral dimensions of leadership, for his friends, for his wife, for his precious daughter. It is breathtaking to me the level to which that disrespect has risen." Gee, I guess ten years later that quote could apply to the quoted. What was that saying I remember about glass houses???

Congressional Aspirant Needs to Brush up on Geography or at Least Consult an Atlas

Republican California Assemblyman, Van Tran, announced his intention to challenge U.S. Representative Loretta Sanchez in the 47th District. The announcement went off without a hitch, except for the little fact that the announcement did not occur in Sanchez's district but rather that of Dana Rohrbacher of the neighboring 46th. An aide to Tran "said Tran and his aides knew the location was outside the district, but went with it anyway because it’s only 'like a block out of Garden Grove' and because it’s a good, central location for the Vietnamese press.

Alrighty then. Apparently this crew doesn't care about little details such as where the district is. Not a good first step for a fledgling campaign against a well-known and well-financed incumbent like Sanchez.

Perhaps Mr. Tran and his team should consult with Miss Teen South Carolina on where to get a map of the 47th District:



Hat tip: Politicalwire.

It's Called Walking

CNN recently had a story that was one part maddening, one part embarrassing, and one part just lame. It was a segment dedicated to President Barack Obama's "swagga." Yes, that's swagga with an "a" not an "er." Hands down one of the lamest segments I've seen on television.

Apparently, the Commander-in-Chief has a "swagga"--a cool kind of walk only black men can pull off. Yes, they even compared the President to 70's cult hero Shaft. Despite the conversation between the anchors excruciatingly detailed in the video, the segment also included an interview with several leaders of the African American community who talked about Obama's swagga. And, this group enlightened me on something, apparently only black folk like to hug which explains why the President is so huggy. Of course, the group did not attempt to explain why the two previous presidents also liked to hug.



Not only was the segment lame in every sense of the word, it is irresponsible. For the first time America has an African American president--do we really need to compare him or his walk to Shaft and play into racial stereotypes that some Americans may still be grappling with?

After the segment (which sucked a few precious minutes out of our lives), my wife turned to me and summed up all we needed to know about the President's "swagga": "It's called walking."

Calling it What it Is: The Mexico City Flu

The New York Times has an interesting article out today about the naming of this latest deadly flu strain--a topic that has bugged me (no pun intended) for several days now. First, it should not be named "swine flu" since it is a hybrid strain composed of 2 parts swine flu, 1 part avian flu, and 1 part human flu. It is also unfair to pork producers who will bear the brunt of the stigma.

As the article explains, pandemic influenza are usually named after the region or country where they were first identified. The naming of such calamities can be quite controversial and politically sensitive.

According to the NYT: "The World Organization for Animal Health, which handles veterinary issues around the world, issued a statement late Monday suggesting that the new disease should be labeled 'North American influenza,' in keeping with a long medical tradition of naming influenza pandemics for the regions where they were first identified. This has included the Spanish flu of 1918 to 1919, the Asian flu of 1957 to 1958 and the Hong Kong flu of 1967 to 1968. The debate is likely to continue as scientists and health authorities try to trace the disease. While all signs now point to Mexico as the epicenter, the genetic material in the virus there was a swine influenza virus of Eurasian origin. And influenza viruses tend to emerge from Asia....But flu specialists in Asia said that the new virus probably did not make the jump from animals to people in Asia."

I would be okay with naming it the North American Flu but ground zero for this particular flu is Mexico City. So, let's call it what it is, The Mexico City Flu.

Air Force One Photo Op Gone Wrong

This is not rocket science or brain surgery. After 9/11, I think it is safe to say that you should not stage a photo op of a jumbo jet flying at low altitudes across the Manhattan skyline. The fact that the airliner happens to be one of the planes that carries the president, also known as Air Force One only when he is on board, makes this a double no-no. The low-flying presidential aircraft is said to have caused near panic in the city which saw two of them crash into the World Trade Center towers that September morning in 2001.



The photo op was staged by the Defense Department which was trying to update its file photos. For his part, President Obama was said to be "furious" about the incident. The director of the White House Military Office, Louis Caldera, took the blame: "Last week, I approved a mission over New York. I take responsibility for that decision. While federal authorities took the proper steps to notify state and local authorities in New York and New Jersey, it's clear that the mission created confusion and disruption."

It is amazing that no one in the White House or DOD thought this might be a bit traumatic for the residents of New York City and put the brakes on the operation. Oh, and it's not as if the plane changed it's colors or design after January 20. Same old plane. I'm pretty sure the old pictures were good enough. Besides the sheer stupidity of the event, I wonder how much this escapade cost taxpayers...

The Obama Administration at 100 Days

The 100 day snapshot is an overrated tool by which to judge a president. After all, most of the grand accomplishments of any president take several months if not years to accomplish. For President Barack Obama, it may be even more unfair--he inherited a more difficult situation than any president in this century. From two wars abroad, to an economic meltdown, to an auto industry near bankruptcy, to a nation of overwhelming pessimism, what individual since Lincoln has had a more difficult environment to deal with upon their inauguration?

The said, this president, love him, hate him, or something in between, has not shrunk from attempting big things. His agenda is enormous: reshape the economic system of the country, rethink the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, rebuild the crumbling infrastructure, remake the health care system, and reverse many of the George W. Bush administration's policies from torture to the environment to secrecy. In his first month he passed the biggest spending bill in American history in the form of the stimulus package, and a gargantuan budget left over from the previous administration. He has pledged to close the Guantanamo Bay prison, bring the troops home from Iraq, and made public hundreds of controversial memos from the Bush administration condoning "enhanced interrogation techniques" (or torture depending upon your point of view) of suspected terrorists. He has taken on pirates and won. He has greeted Hugo Chavez and Daniel Ortega and the Queen of England. He has propped up the financial system and chastised American automakers. All this and more in just 100 days.

The challenges that lie ahead are daunting, perhaps even more daunting than 100 days ago. The financial system is still in crisis, GM and Chrysler are still at the precipice, and North Korea and Iran are as belligerent is ever. And the flu which rages in Mexico and has cropped up in recent days in the United States may pose the biggest challenge of all--an unseen killer spreading sickness and fear throughout the world. And just who do you think America will look to for leadership?

A few years is a much better gauge of a president's accomplishments and leadership than a few months. As we near the end of Obama's first term, it will be much clearer whether this president has achieved most of what he set out to do. For the time being, the 100 days mark is all we have to judge him by.

Flu Fears Abound

I spent the morning at Target today buying emergency supplies, things I don't normally get, at least in great quantities: first aid kit, bottled water, batteries, protective masks, etc. It is only a matter of time until the next global pandemic hits and the time may very well be now.

According to the World Health Organization and medical experts, Mexico and the United States are seeing cases of a totally new influenza strain, H1N1--a lethal combination of swine, avian, and human virus wrapped up as one. 68 people have died in Mexico already with a suspected 1000 plus infected with the new strain. Eight cases have been reported in the U.S. with no deaths. Particularly disturbing is that the majority of dead in Mexico are aged 25-45--an age group that typically does okay during a normal flu outbreak but did poorly during the 1918 Spanish Flu, a global pandemic which killed 50 million people worldwide.

There are some advantages that humankind has in the 21st century which were not available 100 years ago. First, our technology, knowledge, and sanitary practices are better. We also have a better understand of these viruses and have the ability to make vaccines and anti-virals. In this particular instance we also are lucky in the sense that we are entering the warm summer months--a time of year that is inhospitable to flu viruses.

Still, the WHO, CDC, and governments across the globe need to act quickly. The U.S. government should consider temporarily closing the border with Mexico. Some of the 75 students at a private school in Queens, New York, who are suspected of contracting the Mexican flu traveled to Mexico recently. In our global age where international travel is relatively easy, cheap, and common, governments have to act quickly to contain the outbreak, though it may be too late already.

W, the B Movie

I have to be up front about this--I'm not a big fan of Oliver Stone. Loved Platoon. JFK and Nixon, not so much. Both were a perversion of history, mixing fact and fiction, educating or rather mis-educating (is that even a word?) whole generations. That said, when I picked up the W DVD from the library, I was excited. I shouldn't have been. The whole movie was a big disappointment.

Where to start? I'll just ramble now. The acting was bad, real bad. "B" movie bad. The actors seemed more concerned with becoming the caricatures of the people they played than actually playing the people. Rove was painful, Laura was stilted, Rummy was ridiculous, Powell spoke in an odd whisper, and Condi was an over-the-top sycophant. The plot was all over the place and Stone rearranged the timeline like he always does. The musical score was distracting, particularly during the most crucial part of the movie where the inner circle was discussing whether or not to go into Iraq--a scene which needed no score. Finally, if you watch the whole movie, Stone's thesis is that W has Daddy issues and that's what his whole presidency is all about. Sorry, I'm just not buying it.

Lone Star Secession

Texas Governor Rick Perry certainly made news the other day at one of those tea party rallies. Not only did he protest big government and taxes, he started talking about the "S" word--secession. Yes, the governor of America's second largest state began waxing poetic about Texas leaving the union:

"'Texas is a unique place,'" the governor told reporters in Austin. "'When we came into the union in 1845, one of the issues was that we would be able to leave if we decided to do that. My hope is that America, and Washington in particular, pays attention. We’ve got a great union. There’s absolutely no reason to dissolve it. But if Washington continues to thumb their nose at the American people, you know, who knows what might come out of that? But Texas is a very unique place, and we’re a pretty independent lot, to boot.'"

Most scholars think the talk of secession is just political hot air aimed at positioning Perry for a primary fight against fellow Republican Senator Kay Bailey Huchison:

"A&M professor Walter L. Buenger is a fifth-generation Texan and author of a textbook on Texas’ last secession attempt. (The federal occupation lasted eight years after the Civil War.)
'It was a mistake then, and it’s an even bigger mistake now,' Buenger said by phone from College Station, where he has taught almost since Perry was an Aggie yell leader. 'And you can put this in the paper: To even bring it up shows a profound lack of patriotism,' Buenger said. The 1845 joint merger agreement with Congress didn’t give Texas an option clause. The idea of leaving 'was settled long ago,' he said. 'This is simple rabble-rousing and political posturing. That’s all it is.  . . .  Our governor is now identifying himself with the far-right lunatic fringe.'"

If Texas does eventually decide to seceed, the Federal Government won't just wish them well. And, it wouldn't turn out very well for them. But public opinion in Texas is clearly not with the secessionists: 75% of Texans want to stay while only 18% want to leave. Still, I'm amazed that 1 out of 5 would opt for Texas secession...

Bush-Cheney Marriage on the Rocks?

Trouble in paradise. The NYT reports that the relationship between former President George W. Bush and former VP Richard Cheney soured near the end of the administration and continues to be strained. The Bush 43 gang is scheduled to meet this week to discuss the future of the George W. Bush Policy Institute, the Bush library, and legacy. Noticeably absent from the attendee list is the former Veep. Explains the NYT:

"Not coming to next week’s session is former Vice President Dick Cheney, who in the final days of the administration argued with Mr. Bush about his refusal to pardon Mr. Cheney’s former chief of staff, I. Lewis Libby Jr., who was convicted of perjury for his role in the leak of Valerie Wilson’s employment with the Central Intelligence Agency. Mr. Cheney later went on television to air his grievances with Mr. Bush, while also accusing Mr. Obama of endangering the country. That is an approach Mr. Bush has rejected."

This is the second administration in a row in which the relationship between the outgoing president and vice president deteriorated. The relationship between Bill Clinton and Al Gore followed a similar trajectory, though it has improved in recent years. It will be interesting to observe the Bush-Cheney relationship evolve, especially outside the glare of the Klieg lights.

You Must be a Cleveland Sports Fan If...

...you have spent decades in misery rooting for teams that, when they were bad, they were really really bad, and when they were good, they always come up just short.

After all, who can forget Cleveland Brown's running back Earnest Byner's fumble in the 1988 AFC Championship Game against the Denver Broncos. Heck, I'm not even from Ohio or a Cleveland sports fan but that game is burned in my memory. Down 38-31, Byner fumbled with 1:12 to go in the game on the Denver 3 yard line as the Browns were ready to tie. Instead, the fumble allowed the Broncos to eliminate the Browns for the second consecutive year (1987 was the year Elway engineered "The Drive" against Cleveland--perhaps the most amazing comeback drive in NFL history).

Why am I rehashing old war stories from Cleveland's sports past? On April 15, 2009, Cleveland Plain Dealer Columnist Terry Pluto will address a luncheon crowd at the Akron Press Club in The University of Akron's Martin Center. His topic: "The Pain and Suffering of a Cleveland Sports Fan." A lot to talk about. For more details, see the Akron Press Club website.

Obama and the Bankers

Politico offers a fascinating glimpse at some behind-the-scenes dialogue between POTUS and a group of bank CEOs that occurred at a March 27, 2009 meeting at the White House. The tone of the meeting was one way and it was set by the President:

"Arrayed around a long mahogany table in the White House state dining room last week, the CEOs of the most powerful financial institutions in the world offered several explanations for paying high salaries to their employees — and, by extension, to themselves. 'These are complicated companies,' one CEO said. Offered another: 'We’re competing for talent on an international market.' But President Barack Obama wasn’t in a mood to hear them out. He stopped the conversation and offered a blunt reminder of the public’s reaction to such explanations. 'Be careful how you make those statements, gentlemen. The public isn’t buying that.' 'My administration is the only thing between you and the pitchforks.' [emphasis added]."

Seriously, how tone deaf and clueless are these guys? It is a shame that these folks weren't forced to share the same fate as GM's CEO Rick Wagoner last week.