Showing posts with label Clinton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Clinton. Show all posts

Friday, May 15, 2020

White House Chief of Staff Tenure, Reagan-Trump (as of May 15, 2020)

POTUS Chief of Staff Start Finish Days
Reagan 40 James A. Baker III 1/20/1981 2/4/1985 1476
Donald T. Regan 2/4/1985 3/2/1987 756
Howard H. Baker, Jr. 3/2/1987 7/1/1988 487
Kenneth M. Duberstein 7/1/1988 1/20/1989 203
Bush 41 John H. Sununu 1/20/1989 12/6/1991 1050
Samuel K. Skinner 12/6/1991 8/14/1992 252
James A. Baker III 8/14/1992 1/20/1993 159
Clinton 42 Thomas F. McLarty III 1/20/1993 6/28/1994 524
Leon E. Panetta 6/28/1994 1/17/1997 934
Erskine B. Bowles 1/17/1997 10/21/1998 642
John D. Podesta 10/21/1998 1/20/2001 822
Bush 43 Andrew H. Card, Jr. 1/20/2001 4/14/2006 1910
Joshua B. Bolten 4/14/2006 1/20/2009 1012
Obama 44 Rahm I. Emanuel 1/20/2009 10/1/2010 619
William M. Daley 1/13/2011 1/27/2012 379
Jacob J. Lew 1/27/2012 1/25/2013 364
Denis R. McDonough 1/25/2013 1/20/2017 1456
Trump 45 Renhold R. "Reince" Priebus 1/20/2017 7/31/2017 192
John F. Kelly 7/31/2017 1/2/2019 520
John "Mick" Mulvaney 1/2/2019 3/31/2020 454
Mark R. Meadows 3/31/2020 present

COS TENURE AVG
RR-DT COS AVG TENURE:  711
REAGAN 40 COS AVG TENURE: 731
BUSH 41 COS AVG TENURE: 487
CLINTON 42 COS AVG TENURE: 731
BUSH 43 COS AVG TENURE: 1461
OBAMA 44 COS AVG TENURE: 705
TRUMP 45 COS AVG TENURE: 389

Monday, February 27, 2017

Reince's Real Problem

“This administration is running like a fine-tuned machine” --President Donald J. Trump, February 16, 2017

 

It has been a very difficult first month for the fledgling Trump administration. To describe the situation as chaos, bedlam, dysfunction—whatever term you want to use to describe the situation in the White House—is not hyperbole, alternative facts, or fake news. It is reality.

The level and intensity of the chaos within the West Wing is unprecedented in the modern era. Unfortunately for Chief of Staff Reince Priebus, much of the responsibility for bringing order to the West Wing rests with him—the administrative equivalent of taming a pride of circus lions with neither chair nor whip.

For the rest of my op-ed that appeared on CNN, click here.

Friday, October 31, 2008

Smooth Transitioning: Using the Clinton Experience as a Model of What Not To Do

RAMPANT SPECULATION

It seems that over the last few days speculation is running rampant on who would populate a Barack Obama administration. Though much of this speculation has surrounded who would be tapped as chief of staff, the game has moved on to other positions. Ben Smith of Politico has an excellent rundown of the potential musical chairs that would take place in the event of an Obama victory.

Two strands run through all these various stories: 1) Obama would move with light speed to lock up his White House staff and cabinet; and, 2) an Obama administration would be dominated by former Clinton staffers. If true on both counts, this would be a smart move by the Obama folks.

LESSONS OF THE CLINTON TRANSITION

The Clinton transition was a disaster for a number of reasons, not least of which was because it moved at a glacial pace. The White House staff was not in place until just before the inaugural on January 20, 1993--far too late to properly organize for the flurry of events that will face the White House in just Week 1.

Also, because of the prejudices due to the perceived failure of the Carter White House, experienced Carter aides were essentially blacklisted from being hired at the outset of the Clinton administration. Instead, young campaign staffers who had never worked in Washington before or done much of anything in politics except working on campaigns were placed into all sorts of high level positions on the White House staff. Thus, the Clinton White House bus in those first days was driven by a bunch of youngsters who had just gotten their temporary licenses and were handed the keys to drive in a city in which they were unfamiliar. In other words: a recipe for disaster.

AVOIDING THE PITFALLS OF THE EARLY CLINTON YEARS

Obama and his team, if the reporting is correct, seems to have learned the lessons of the 1993 fiasco. Picking a team of experienced White House aides early is the surest way to hit the ground running. A drawback is that leaves only one bench of White House veterans for Obama to draw on: former Clinton officials. The Carter people, for the most part, are too old. The pace of the White House and the 80 hour work weeks dictates that the staff as a whole be younger, at least in many of the middle and lower rungs. However, this does not mean that an Obama White House would only have former Clintonistas in it. It would surely be peppered with campaign staff and Illinois loyalists. However, the Clinton folks would make up the largest contingent--as they should. A new White House needs to draw on veteran hands--people who know how the place operates and where the bodies are buried.

White House.gov Photo Gallery Feed

White House.gov Blog Feed

White House Flickr Photostream

Site Meter

WIKIO

Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics

Followers