Every decade
in years ending in zero, as mandated by the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. House
of Representatives is reapportioned to account for population shifts within the
country. As part of that process, many states choose, and some are forced, to
redraw or redistrict the legislative lines of both the state and U.S.
congressional districts. If this process proceeds in a state dominated by one
party and not subject to a non-partisan commission, it usually results in
obvious and exaggerated partisan gerrymandering—lines drawn to benefit one
political party at the expense of the other. This process is considered
constitutional as long as it does not harm the interests of minority or ethnic
groupings.
Such was the case in Ohio, a state carried by Democrat Barack Obama
in 2008 and 2012, and a state where 38% of voters in 2012 identified as
Democrats (compared to 31% identifying as Republican) according to 2012 exit
polls. Because of the gerrymandered congressional redistricting process carried
out by the Ohio Republican Party in the Buckeye State in 2011, 12 of Ohio’s 16
(or 75%) U.S. congressional districts are held by Republicans representing
relatively safe districts. Ohio voters have little chance to affect the outcome
of congressional elections during the general election season. Most observers know, before the election even occurs, which party will win which congressional
district. Regardless of which party benefits from gerrymandering, such a situation in a swing state like Ohio is an abomination. Ohio is not alone and a number of states were gerrymandered in an extreme fashion in 2011 (including Illinois which had Democrats drawing the lines).
As harmful to
representative democracy as gerrymandering of legislative districts is, a new
movement to essentially gerrymander future presidential elections is beginning.
In a number of swing states in which the state legislature and gubernatorial
office is controlled by the GOP, efforts are beginning to change the way
electoral votes would be won and accounted for. In all states except Maine and
Nebraska, electoral votes are currently awarded in a winner-take-all
format—i.e., whichever presidential candidate wins the popular vote in a
particular state wins all the electoral votes. However, in a number of
battleground states such as Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin there have been rumblings from GOP elected and election officials that perhaps it is time to alter that accounting method. In Virginia, a full-fledged effort is underway. Why? Because these swing states, despite their swing state status, have been
trending towards the Democratic Party for a number of years and all were won by
Obama in the last two elections. By shifting the awarding of electoral votes
from a winner-take-all format to one based on the winner of gerrymandered
congressional districts, a state party could alter the outcome of a
presidential election in that state and potentially change the outcome of the
presidential election in the country.
Using Ohio as an example, had such a
congressional district system been in place for 2012, President Obama would
have received just six of Ohio’s eighteen total electoral votes—he carried the
four Democratic districts and would have received two more electoral votes
(representing Ohio’s two senate seats) for carrying the whole state. Add up
potential electoral vote losses in other swing states for Obama and it is a
matter of basic arithmetic that the 2012 electoral vote total would have been
much closer than the 332-206 result. In fact, Huffington Post crunched the numbers for the entire country. In 2012, had all states utilized the congressional district method currently used by Maine and Nebraska, the electoral vote result would have been: Obama 265 - Romney 273. This despite the fact that Obama would have won a clear popular vote victory.
Will this
effort to gerrymander the presidential election succeed? With media attention and increased
public awareness, such schemes to game future presidential elections will
likely fail. But it is unclear whether this issue will receive the attention it
deserves over the next three years to stave off a successful effort.